Another great Wired Article today on the disappointment in the web community regarding the presidential debates. Fortunately the site 10 Questions is bringing the debate format into the 21st century. Check out this excerpt from wired on the logic behind it:

In the CNN-YouTube debate in July, it was CNN producers who chose the online-video questions to present to candidates. Similarly, in the ongoing MySpace and MTV forums, journalists serve as filters between voters and candidates. TechPresident’s goal is to provide U.S. voters the leading role in controlling the much-touted national dialogue with the presidential candidates.

The project’s organizers are hoping to do that with social software designed to enable “the crowd” to speak responsibly with a collaborative voice. They plan to keep their online voting system simple, and audit the tallied votes.

The point, says Sifry, is to create a large-scale online forum with the same rhetorical attributes that characterize physical town-hall meetings, instead of tweaking a commercial broadcast medium that provides candidates with 30 seconds to advertise their personalities and positions.

Popularity: 5% [?]


SPEAK / ADD YOUR COMMENT
Comments are moderated.

Return to Top

Democracy 2.0?

TAG / CLOUD

alps aoutmata Artficial intelligence Aspen berthoud Bike bike dirt jump Billy Pool communication conservation crash design dirt jump dj doug coombs Downhill facebook for sale freeride freeskiing funny green hawaii hip hop housekeeping kleptones market Mash up masshup Moto music photos powder road bike scripting Ski skiing ski photos technology telluride transition Travel video web 2.0 wildernest

FRESH / LATEST POSTS

FEATURED / BEST OF adamhevenor.com

EnglishFrenchGermanItalianPortugueseRussianSpanish
g-stats

Categories


Photos

Jamie IMG_0216.jpg to Cham Stew IMG_1097.jpg Rob IMG_0606.jpg Town Park IMG_0570.jpg IMG_0468.jpg Alpine Riding IMG_0678.jpg Down from Borro Pass